CNBC - Programming changes
First let me acknowledge that there may be contractual obligations that come in play here. However, during the volatility in the stock market, specifically the first few days in February, you made a program change after Mad Money to have Jim Cramer stay on to assist viewers.
Thank you. That was welcome and justified. He is the MAN to me and thousands. Yet, during the continued volatility when the Olympics began, your choice to not air Mad Money, and air curling in its place I feel was an oversight.
But the choice to then continue to air RERUNS of Shark Tank was neglect to viewers in my eyes. Reruns of shark Tank have no importance during this volatility. You could have and should have aired Mad Money in its normal time slot and then aired curling. You could have taped Mad Money and aired it in place of shark Tank reruns.
I am very disappointed in your decision to "leave invested viewers in the dark" during these trying times. I expect more from you as you are a financial station first and have a reputation as such. FYI, I am retired and CNBC is "my radio" that when home (mostly) is on ALL DAY LONG from 7:00 - 5:00 when Mad Money is done.
I thank you for the format to express my opinion and hope you feel my angst. Michael Cooper
Reason of review: programing.
Monetary Loss: $1000.
Preferred solution: program changes.
Thank You for Your Reply! We are processing your message.
Comments
Please avoid publishing any personal information and promotional content
Oh God..must be another Eagles fan...