CNBC Reviews and Complaints
Subscribe to organize reviews of the company into easy-to-read list. You can view followed brands in your profile
4 of 185 reviews with 4-star rating.
Complaint - calls fellow source "stupid" to his face. Uses "wtf" on air - in front of my family. . . . In general I dislike his reporting - I'm a republican. Since this needs to be 100 words, I am not given to much gab so I will have to do my best anyway. I wonder if...
- Bias against and hatred towards our president
Reason of review
Let the company propose a solution
2017 Thanks and No Thanks... | CNBC review from Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
Dear CNBC, For many 2017 CNBC shows, I'd like to Thank these anchors who are able to report facts with integrity to us customers. They have helped us making better investment decision. Please keep up the good work and forward my heartfelt thanks to them: (1) Many Thanks to : David Faber, Carl Quintanilla, Steve Liesman, Andrew Sorkins, Jim Crammer, Kate Kelly, Melissa Lee, Phil Lebeau, Bill Griffith, Michael Santali, Ron Insana, Tyler Mathisen, Stephanie Link, etc. The Best Show is David Faber, Carl Quintanilla, and Jim Cramner at 9 am. Thank You !!! Faber is still the Best!!!! (2) NO Thanks to: Joe Kernen and Rick Santalli. ***Please Please Please consider Andrew Sorkins or someone else to be the lead anchor in Squawk Box show. We need someone who is calm and honest to provide early morning news. It really upset us when we try to understand the market direction every morning while Joe Kernen keep attacking anyone who disagree with his political views. Mr. kernen should retire and allow people like Kelly, Sorkins, or others who can report news professionally. Rick Santalli has good ideas EXCEPT he loves to throws his 2 cents of political bias. People like Kernen and Santalli will make any market more volatile because they could not control themselves. I have followed CNBC since early 1990s. Please conside my suggestions. Thanks. IR02138a@gmail.com
Kirsten Gillibrand’s snow job | CNBC review
Hard to believe seasoned news commentators are falling for Gillibrand’s obvious snow job. Come on..she is not admitting anything negative in any Clinton..it is a ploy to get Trump on allegations..read between the lines..she knows Clinton’s debacle is in the past and can only be talked about.. when she says times were different then she is saying not to allow it to happen again by giving Trump a pass..I cannot believe ALL the press fell for it!
CNBC Gets an "F" In Debate Hosting
I'm a 68 year old baby boomer and I have seen my share of debates, but I have never seen one as bad as last nights debate on CNBC conducted by their business anchors. In the intro one of the commentators said he hoped they were able to "really get the candidates to go after one another." I think Senator Cruze was spot on when he told them they were trying to turn the debate into a "cage fight." I am amazed at how TERRIBLE and INSIPID the questions were. Fortunately many of the candidates called the moderators on these "nasty" questions, as Trump put it. This is yet another example of the liberal media in action trying to make Republicans look bad. I rarely watch CNBC, but I can tell you that I will never watch it again. I have a really bad taste in my mouth after watching their horrible moderators.
- Presidential debate
Reason of review
Terrible debate format, horrible moderators
Get moderators who aren't trying to provoke a fight and formulate questions based on real issues.
Thank You for Your Reply!
Thank You for Your Reply! We are processing your message.
Thank You for Your Submission
Your comment is successfully posted.
Do you have something to say about CNBC? What happened? What can we help you with?